Jump To Navigation

Case Law

Abromeit v. Montana Rail Link, Inc.

Date Decided: September 15th, 2010
Originally Filed in: Montana (federal)
Decided by: Montana District Court (Federal)
Court: D.Mont.
Judge: Molloy
Citation: 2010 WL 3724425

Background:

Plaintiff, a railroad worker, brought this FELA action against Montana Rail Link (Employer) for injuries sustained while plaintiff was working on the railroad tracks.  Plaintiff alleges that he was injured on two distinct occasions.  First, he was injured while inserting railroad spikes into ties when his hydraulic hammer became entangled.  Second, he was injured when lost his footing when the surface of the track adjacent to a new railroad tie gave way, causing him injury by exacerbating his previous injury.  Plaintiff's complaint alleged a claim under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, and he bolstered his argument by citing various violations of railroad safety statutes.  Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that plaintiff is (1) limited to the specific causes of action and theory of recovery that plaintiff identified in his preliminary pretrial statement, and that (2) plaintiff theories of recovery do not provide a basis for recovery.  With regard to this second point, the plaintiff alleged that the Federal Railroad Safety Act precluded plaintiffs negligence claim under the FELA.


Issues:

(1) Is a plaintiff limited to the causes of action and theories of recovery that he pleads with a level of particularity within his preliminary pretrial statement?  (2) Does the FRSA preclude a FELA claim when the plaintiff's theory of recovery is that the walkway between railways presented an unreasonably unsafe condition that caused his injuries?


Held:

(1) No.  Even though Local Rule 16.2(b)(1)(D) requires that the plaintiff disclose the legal theory underlying each claim within a preliminary pretrial report, the plaintiff need not exhaust with particularity each rule or regulation violated by the defendant, provided that the defendant has been reasonably placed on notice so that the defendant can pin down his theories of defense.  To hold otherwise would require the evisceration of Rule 15(b) of the federal rules of civil procedure.  (2) No.  The FRSA does not preclude a FELA claim when the plaintiff's theory of recovery is that a walkway between railways presented an unreasonably unsafe condition that caused his injuries.  The test for whether the FRSA precludes the FELA is whether the pertinent area of law under the FELA is substantially subsumed by the FRSA. The court reasoned that the pertinent regulations promulgated under the act are limited to addressing the materials that support a railroad's track (e.g. ballast, aka rocks), and that such regulation is silent on the issue of walkways.  The court reasoned that plaintiff's allegation concerned the quality of the workplace provided for employees, and not the safety of the train itself.   Therefore, the regulations under the FRSA did not substantially subsume the plaintiff's theory of recovery under the FELA.  


Comments:

The FRSA does not preclude a FELA claim when the plaintiff's theory of recovery is that a walkway between railways presented an unreasonably unsafe condition that caused his injuries.


<< PREVNEXT >>

Abromeit

Overall issues discussed or touched upon by this case:
Free Case Evaluation Form Talk to a Lawyer Now
Please complete the math to prove you are not a robot:
=
in-depth overview FELA click here

LATEST CASE LAWS

In re Ricky Joe Jones, Cheryl Ann Jones, Debtors

Date Decided: Jan 25th, 2011
Decided By: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit(Bankruptcy) (Federal) read more

Leandrew Lewis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Date Decided: Mar 10th, 2011
Decided By: Ohio Southern District Court (Federal) read more

Subscribe to Case Law Feed

LATEST RAILROAD NEWS

Train Carrying Crude Oil Derails Causing Explosion & Fire in Alabama Wetlands

 ALICEVILLE, AL – A train carrying tanker cars full of crude oil derailed on November 8 causing an explosion and fire in a wetlands area just outside Aliceville, AL. The city of Aliceville is... read more

Railroad Worker Injured in Midvale, Utah TRAX Train Crash

 MIDVALE, UT – A TRAX commuter train crashed into an empty passenger car that was sitting on the tracks on November 6, derailing the train and injuring two passengers and a railroad employee in... read more

CSX Train Derails in Millcreek Township, PA

 MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP, PA – Four CSX rail cars full of construction debris derailed in Millcreek Township, PA on November 1, causing traffic delays at several intersections. Millcreek Township is... read more

Three CSX Railroad Workers One Motorist Injured at Bradner, OH Rail Crossing

 BRADNER, OH – Three CSX railroad employees were injured at a rail crossing just south of Bradner, OH on October 28, when a motorist drove around construction barriers and hit a utility pole and... read more

Subscribe RSS
Attorneys Refer your cases here

Toll-Free: 800-773-6770
Local: 713-668-9999
Fax: 713-668-1980
1811 Bering Drive, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77057

Of Counsel Offices

David Lockard
15 W Highland Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19118

Fred Bremseth
Minnesota Office
601 Carlson Parkway
Suite 995
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305

Montana Office
100 North 27th Street
Suite 220
Billings, Montana 59101