Jump To Navigation

Case Law

BNSF Railway Company v. LaFarge Southwest, Inc.

Date Decided: February 12th, 2009
Originally Filed in: ()
Decided by: (State)
Court: U.S.D.C. New Mexico
Judge: Judge Armijo
Citation: 2009 WL 4279771 (D.N.M.)

Background:
Before this Court was plaintiff's, BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF") Motion in Limine to exclude expert opinions and testimony of claimant's expert relating to railroad operations. The action arose from a fatal collision between an eastbound freight train operated by a BNSF Railway Company engineer, and a commercial dump trunk being driven by decedent Carol Duran, a contractor for third party defendant, Lafarge Southwest Inc. ("Lafarge"). One year after the accident, the claimant's proposed expert witness on accident reconstruction, visited the scene of the accident. The expert took photographs meant to establish what the engineer and conductor should have seen as their train approached the crossing. The expert also included accident report, deposition testimony of the engineer and conductor, and geometry measurements of the track to determine the "relative positioning of various objects". On the basis of his review, the expert opined that the train crew was "obviously inattentive and failed to maintain a proper lookout..." prior to the accident. BNSF moved to exclude the expert's opinions as to the train crew's duties as both (1) beyond his area of expertise and (2) not likely to assist the jury

Issues:
Did this Court grant BNSF's motion to in limine to exclude claimant's expert opinion testimony?

Held:
First, the Court held that the expert was qualified through experience, training, and education as an expert in the field of accident reconstruction. The expert has been the President of a group that specializes in forensic traffic accident reconstruction consulting and special investigations. He has been in the field for 20 years. Moreover, claimant's expert has been accredited since 1993 as a traffic accident reconstructionist through the Accreditation Commission for Traffic Accident Reconstruction. BSNF sought to exclude the expert's proposed opinions to the extent they are directed to the standard of care applicable to railroad operations including when the BNSF crew should have seen the truck, should have sounded the horn, and should have engaged emergency braking. Specifically, BSNF objected to the expert's opinion relating to railroad operations, concluding that the crew was "inattentive". As such, this Court found that the claimant's expert was not qualified to provide an opinion as to the duties of the train crew. However, the Court further explained that even if they did determine claimant's expert to provide an opinion about the duties of the crew would not be helpful to the jury. This Court found that they are based on the belief that the crew was under the duty to blow the horn when they could have reasonably seen the obstruction in the roadway. Accordingly, this Court granted BNSF's motion in limine and excluded claimant's expert testimony.

Comments:
Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence imposes a "gatekeeping" obligation on this Court to ensure that expert testimony is not admitted to trial unless it is relevant and reliable. The relevance of the testimony is weighed under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, which weighs the probative value (importance of the evidence) with the prejudicial effect (potential bias it may create). In examining expert testimony the Court must also determine whether (1) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data (2) it is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles/methods reliably to the facts. Steve Gordon

<< PREVNEXT >>

BNSF Railway Company

Overall issues discussed or touched upon by this case:
Free Case Evaluation Form Talk to a Lawyer Now
Please complete the math to prove you are not a robot:
=
in-depth overview FELA click here

LATEST CASE LAWS

In re Ricky Joe Jones, Cheryl Ann Jones, Debtors

Date Decided: Jan 25th, 2011
Decided By: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit(Bankruptcy) (Federal) read more

Leandrew Lewis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Date Decided: Mar 10th, 2011
Decided By: Ohio Southern District Court (Federal) read more

Subscribe to Case Law Feed

LATEST RAILROAD NEWS

Train Carrying Crude Oil Derails Causing Explosion & Fire in Alabama Wetlands

 ALICEVILLE, AL – A train carrying tanker cars full of crude oil derailed on November 8 causing an explosion and fire in a wetlands area just outside Aliceville, AL. The city of Aliceville is... read more

Railroad Worker Injured in Midvale, Utah TRAX Train Crash

 MIDVALE, UT – A TRAX commuter train crashed into an empty passenger car that was sitting on the tracks on November 6, derailing the train and injuring two passengers and a railroad employee in... read more

CSX Train Derails in Millcreek Township, PA

 MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP, PA – Four CSX rail cars full of construction debris derailed in Millcreek Township, PA on November 1, causing traffic delays at several intersections. Millcreek Township is... read more

Three CSX Railroad Workers One Motorist Injured at Bradner, OH Rail Crossing

 BRADNER, OH – Three CSX railroad employees were injured at a rail crossing just south of Bradner, OH on October 28, when a motorist drove around construction barriers and hit a utility pole and... read more

Subscribe RSS
Attorneys Refer your cases here

Toll-Free: 800-773-6770
Local: 713-668-9999
Fax: 713-668-1980
1811 Bering Drive, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77057

Of Counsel Offices

David Lockard
15 W Highland Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19118

Fred Bremseth
Minnesota Office
601 Carlson Parkway
Suite 995
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305

Montana Office
100 North 27th Street
Suite 220
Billings, Montana 59101