Cohara v. CSX Transportation Inc.Date Decided: May 11th, 2010 Originally Filed in: Ohio (Federal)
Decided by: U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit (Federal)
Court: The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Judge: Judge Gibbons
Citation: Cohara v. CSX Transportation Inc., 2010 WL 1851370 (6th Cir. 2010)
Background:
Joseph Cohara (Cohara) suffered a shoulder injury while operating a railroad switch on January 10, 2007 for his employer, CSX Transportation (CSX). Cohara filed suit against CSX under the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) but the defendant was found not liable. A motion for a new trial was filed by Cohara. In support of this motion, Cohara alleges that CSX improperly withheld evidence until ten days before trial. Before trial, Cohara filed a motion for sanctions requesting the court to bar CSX from using all the material that was disclosed just 10 days prior to trial. The trial court did not rule on Cohara's motion for sanctions and proceeded for trial. During the trial, Cohara did not object to the admission of the evidence. After the jury returned a verdict in favor of CSX, Cohara made his motion for new trial which the court denied and now he appeals. Issues: Does Cohara's failure to preserve his objection at trial bar him from raising the issue of admissibility of the untimely discovered evidence bar him from filing appeal? Was there sufficient prejudice to require reversal? Held: The Sixth Circuit began its analysis by explaining that the proper standard of review when reviewing a denial of a motion for new trial is the abuse of discretion standard. In order for Cohara to prevail, he must show that suffered prejudice and that failure to grant a new trial is inconsistent with substantial justice. Tompkin v. Philip Morris USA, Inc., 362 F.3d 882, 891 (6th Cir.2004). But the Sixth Circuit held that because Cohara did not object to the admission of the documents at trail that he cannot rely on their admission to show prejudice. See Tobin v. Astra Pharm. Prods., Inc., 993 F.2d 528, 541 (6th Cir.1993); see also Fed.R.Evid. 103(a)(1). Further, the Sixth Circuit held that even if the court were to consider the admission inappropriate that Cohara would be unable to show prejudice because he was not a victim of trial by ambush since he had access to all of CSX's evidence at least 10 days before trial. Erskine v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 814 F.2d 266, 272 (6th Cir.1987). Comments:
The proper standard of review when reviewing a denial of a motion for new trial is the abuse of discretion standard. << PREVNEXT >> |
- Practice Areas
- FELA Basics
- Common Railroad Worker Injuries
- FELA Lawyer Answers Frequently Asked Questions
- Why Do You Need an Attorney for a FELA Claim?
- FELA Claims Process
- FELA Recoverable Damages
- Railroads
- Railroad Disability Benefits
- Railroad Retirement Benefits
- Railroad Retirement Board FAQ
- Resources
Case Law
Cohara
Overall issues discussed or touched upon by this case:
LATEST CASE LAWS
Arnold v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Date Decided: Dec 3rd, 2010
Decided By: Ohio Southern District Court (Federal) read more
Cobb v. Soo Line Railroad Company
Date Decided: Dec 7th, 2010
Decided By: Minnesota Court of Appeals (State) read more
LATEST RAILROAD NEWS
Amtrak Train Hits Semi Truck and Derails in Leoni Township, MI, 10 People Injured
LEONI TOWNSHIP, MI – An Amtrak train collided with a tractor trailer and then derailed in Leoni Township, MI sending 10 people to the hospital on Wednesday, February 1, 2012. Leoni Township is... read more
Railroad Worker Falls to His Death While Working on MacArthur Bridge in St Louis
ST. LOUIS, MO – A railroad worker, employed by the Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis, fell to his death from the MacArthur Bridge Wednesday afternoon Jan.25. The victim, identified as... read more
Railroads Fight Rail Safety Improvement Act with Help from GOP and Obama
A California train disaster that occurred less than four years ago on Sept. 12, 2008 causing 25 deaths and 135 injuries in Chatsworth, CA, was the catalyst for the passage of The Rail Safety... read more
NTSB Issues New Safety Recommendations Restricting Railroad Speeds
WASHINGTON, DC – On January 12, 2012, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued new safety recommendations regarding the restriction of railroad train speeds in the light of five... read more
Toll-Free: 800-773-6770
Local: 713-668-9999
Fax: 713-668-1980
1811 Bering Drive, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77057
Of Counsel Offices
David Lockard
15 W Highland Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19118
Fred Bremseth
Minnesota Office
601 Carlson Parkway
Suite 995
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305
Montana Office
100 North 27th Street
Suite 220
Billings, Montana 59101