Jump To Navigation

Case Law

McCann v. Illinois Central Railroad Co.

Date Decided: May 12th, 2010
Originally Filed in: Illinois (Federal)
Decided by: Illinois Central District Court (Federal)
Court: U.S.D.C. C.D. of Illinois
Judge: JudgeMcCuskey
Citation: McCann v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 2010 WL 1905093 (C.D.Il. 2010)

Background:

McCann returned to the employment of the Defendant in 1970.  He left the employ of the defendant due to shoulder pain that was not relate to work but has filed this suit claiming injuries to his cervical spine (neck) and to his wrist, carpal tunnel syndrome.  In August of 2002, McCann suffered injuries to his right ankle and his left wrist from a motorcycle accident. 

McCann saw Dr. Schoedinger who explained that his neck pain was a repetitive-type injury from working as an engineer.  Dr. Schoedinger, qualified his statement that he has not observed the work of an engineer working for Defendant and could not say what component of Plaintiff's degeneration was related to work.  An expert on the topic, Tyler Kress, testified that McCann has experienced years of spinal degration and that there is clear evidence of joint degeneration and pains/problems after a number of years of railroad work that progressed over the years resulting in anatomical damage.

A separate doctor, Dr. Dove, diagnosed McCann with carpal tunnel.  This injury has not been tied to his work at the railroad by any doctor. 

Issues:
1) Should the defendant's motion to bar the causation opinions of Dr. Schoedinger and Tyler Kress be granted?  2) Should the defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted? 3) Should the Plaintiffs motion to supplement be granted?

Held:

1) The court relied on Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of evidence to determine whether to bar the two witnesses' testimony on causation.  Under 702 there are two requirements for the admission of expert testimony: "(1) the expert must be qualified, and (2) the subject matter of the expert's testimony must consist of specialized knowledge that will be helpful or essential to the trier of fact in deciding the case."  Further, the court explained that the proffered expert's opinion must be: (1) based upon sufficient facts or data; (2) the product of reliable procedures or methods; and (3) applied reliably to the facts of the case.  The court rejected the testimony of Dr. Schoedinger because they were based upon assumption and speculation and not upon testing or review of scientific data.  In regards to Kress, the court acknowledged that his methods were more likely to be admissible under 702 but that Kress's deposition showed that he had little or no knowledge regarding the actual "risk factors" McCann was exposed to and, instead, based his testimony on generalized knowledge of the railroad industry.  Thus, the defendant's motion to bar was granted.

 

2) In addressing the motion for summary judgment the court first outlined the standard for determining whether summary judgment was appropriate.  Summary judgment is appropriate where the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.  The defendant alleges that McCann has failed to provide any evidence of causation linking the defendant to McCann's injuries.  Under FELA, a plaintiff must only show that an employer's negligence played any part, even the slightest, in producing the injury.  Fulk v. Ill. Cent. R. Co., 22 F.3d 120, 124 (7th Cir.1994).  Here, however, the court concluded that McCann proffered no evidence that any of his injuries are related to the Defendant's actions since the expert testimony above is inadmissible.

 

3) The McCAnn's motion to supplement his pleadings was denied by the court.  The court explained that each case must be resolved on the particular facts of that case.  The fact that Dr. Schoedinger and Kress' testimony was allowed in another similar case does not mean the same evidence in this case is admissible.  Further, the additional evidence that the plaintiff seeks to introduce through the amendment came after the final date for discovery. 

Comments:
Under 702 there are two requirements for the admission of expert testimony: (1) the expert must be qualified, and (2) the subject matter of the expert's testimony must consist of specialized knowledge that will be helpful or essential to the trier of fact in deciding the case.

<< PREVNEXT >>
Free Case Evaluation Form Talk to a Lawyer Now
Please complete the math to prove you are not a robot:
=
in-depth overview FELA click here

LATEST CASE LAWS

In re Ricky Joe Jones, Cheryl Ann Jones, Debtors

Date Decided: Jan 25th, 2011
Decided By: U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit(Bankruptcy) (Federal) read more

Leandrew Lewis v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Date Decided: Mar 10th, 2011
Decided By: Ohio Southern District Court (Federal) read more

Subscribe to Case Law Feed

LATEST RAILROAD NEWS

Train Carrying Crude Oil Derails Causing Explosion & Fire in Alabama Wetlands

 ALICEVILLE, AL – A train carrying tanker cars full of crude oil derailed on November 8 causing an explosion and fire in a wetlands area just outside Aliceville, AL. The city of Aliceville is... read more

Railroad Worker Injured in Midvale, Utah TRAX Train Crash

 MIDVALE, UT – A TRAX commuter train crashed into an empty passenger car that was sitting on the tracks on November 6, derailing the train and injuring two passengers and a railroad employee in... read more

CSX Train Derails in Millcreek Township, PA

 MILLCREEK TOWNSHIP, PA – Four CSX rail cars full of construction debris derailed in Millcreek Township, PA on November 1, causing traffic delays at several intersections. Millcreek Township is... read more

Three CSX Railroad Workers One Motorist Injured at Bradner, OH Rail Crossing

 BRADNER, OH – Three CSX railroad employees were injured at a rail crossing just south of Bradner, OH on October 28, when a motorist drove around construction barriers and hit a utility pole and... read more

Subscribe RSS
Attorneys Refer your cases here

Toll-Free: 800-773-6770
Local: 713-668-9999
Fax: 713-668-1980
1811 Bering Drive, Suite 300
Houston, TX 77057

Of Counsel Offices

David Lockard
15 W Highland Ave
Philadelphia, PA 19118

Fred Bremseth
Minnesota Office
601 Carlson Parkway
Suite 995
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55305

Montana Office
100 North 27th Street
Suite 220
Billings, Montana 59101